NaNOx Chronicles

This is a blog about all things NaNOx

▼
Showing posts with label detector. Show all posts
Showing posts with label detector. Show all posts
May 10, 2021

Summary notes

›
The Summary of the 510(k) submission by Nanox for its Nanox.Cart device was published last week.  Here are some observations, in no particu...
April 21, 2021

Another confirmation that Nanox.Arc is fake

›
Nanox tweets a short video today, confirming that Nanox.Arc is a non-functional fake "future product," rather than a real device ...
March 26, 2021

CT vs Tomo vs Fluoro

›
I have been having some interesting discussion with Nuno Lemos aka StockZombie @ Twitter, who has compiled his due diligence on Nanox at ...
1 comment:
March 08, 2021

Cost confusion

›
How much does the fancy Nanox.Arc 2.0 cost to manufacture? The original press release says $10,000, and it can do, among others: Real-time ...
February 24, 2021

The production Nanox.Arc has no detector?

›
So John Nosta puts a  tweet  out that shows that Nanox.Arc has no detector , and therefore, cannot make any images.  Stock goes up 15%. Her...
January 07, 2021

Random youtube comments

›
Some random comments, slightly edited, on youtube [and elsewhere]: If the FDA approves or clears a device that violates the laws of physics,...
January 04, 2021

Puzzles

›
This was Nanox.Arc version 1.5, per tech page .     The device is obviously non-functional, despite the 11 glass tubes drawn in it.  It is m...
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.