NaNOx Chronicles
This is a blog about all things NaNOx
(Move to ...)
Home
Forbidden Chronicles
Legal / Terms of Use
About
▼
Showing posts with label
ugly
.
Show all posts
Showing posts with label
ugly
.
Show all posts
June 09, 2021
Just too good to be true
›
Steven Koepke, who goes by koepkesd @ Stocktwits and Steven @ Yahoo, has been busy reading this blog while trying to justify the lies by the...
May 11, 2021
This head here has this tube inside
›
The CEO got caught lying again, and the RSNA 2020 demo was fake . On the Q1 results call today, the CEO revealed that the Nanox.Cart devic...
April 07, 2021
News in Nanox annual report
›
What's news and notable in Nanox annual report , relative to the Prospectus filed in February? Material weakness We have identified a ...
April 06, 2021
Pumping while selling
›
The CEO went on Bloomberg yesterday to pump the stock. He did not tell the audience that he put an order to sell 1,003,931 shares just ho...
April 03, 2021
Nanox announces FDA clearance of something
›
According to the press release , Nanox single-source Nanox.ARC digital x-ray technology has received 510(k) clearance from the US Food and D...
March 31, 2021
Marketing vs reality
›
Nanox greets us this morning with another tweet , as it is about to fail its milestone which called for "FDA approved" by the end...
March 19, 2021
How does the device look like?
›
Nanox website, investor presentations, social media, press releases and promo pieces are all littered with designs and photos of various ver...
March 13, 2021
Importance of using the right terminology
›
Nanox and its promoters want you to believe that FDA clearance, also known as premarket notification or 510(k), and FDA approval are the sam...
January 29, 2021
Tricky terminology
›
Nanox has a problem with the terminology it is using - is it innocently incompetent or intentionally misleading? Nanox typically, but not ...
January 20, 2021
Planned spontaneity
›
There are two reasons why the scan of the CEO's hand at RSNA 2020 was not spontaneous as he pretended. Reason 1: About 9:20 into video ...
January 08, 2021
Nanox chances for FDA clearance are dimming
›
Nanox claims to have submitted its official response to an accredited Review Organization under the FDA 510(k) Third Party Review Program a...
6 comments:
These are the facts
›
Ugly source: RSNA2020 live demo Nanox has not submitted anything for FDA approval. It is illegal to market a Class II MEDICAL device, such ...
›
Home
View web version