NaNOx Chronicles
This is a blog about all things NaNOx
(Move to ...)
Home
Forbidden Chronicles
Legal / Terms of Use
About
▼
February 26, 2021
You can't have it both ways
›
Even the best artists (scam artists included) slip sometimes - they are human, after all. Let's take a listen to what the CEO has to sa...
February 24, 2021
The production Nanox.Arc has no detector?
›
So John Nosta puts a tweet out that shows that Nanox.Arc has no detector , and therefore, cannot make any images. Stock goes up 15%. Her...
February 18, 2021
Nanox is faking it and stealing
›
Nanox posted a promotional video today titled "NanoxCLOUD Demo Flow" and then removed it (after some comments on it emerged). It...
2 comments:
February 09, 2021
The individuals behind the Nanox pump
›
I was referred to a writeup by a self-described stock marker nerd and writer for the The Motley Fool (thanks Nibbler @AuntMinnie). Whi...
January 29, 2021
Tricky terminology
›
Nanox has a problem with the terminology it is using - is it innocently incompetent or intentionally misleading? Nanox typically, but not ...
January 27, 2021
Asking stupid questions
›
So, a stupid question arose today in a discussion about what would be a plausible defense by a scam artist. Question: Did Nanox CEO graduat...
January 25, 2021
The Swedish Nanox - Luxbright
›
Luxbright is a publicly-traded stock in Sweden that claims to have developed a ZnO "whiskers" cold-cathode x-ray tube. Luxbright ...
January 20, 2021
Planned spontaneity
›
There are two reasons why the scan of the CEO's hand at RSNA 2020 was not spontaneous as he pretended. Reason 1: About 9:20 into video ...
January 14, 2021
The weight of a human, CE Marking, and the rest
›
The fake battery-powered Nanox.Arc 1.0 body scanner can withstand a human, according to a photo shown in June 2020 Haaretz article . Nan...
January 12, 2021
Fooling one or the other, or both
›
Someone liked this comment I made: The draft registration statement filed by Nanox in early February states that the company is planning to ...
January 09, 2021
How SK Telecom promotes its investment
›
If the lie is big enough, and if you repeat it, maybe people will start believing it. Someone posted a link to the June 2020 press release ...
1 comment:
January 08, 2021
Nanox chances for FDA clearance are dimming
›
Nanox claims to have submitted its official response to an accredited Review Organization under the FDA 510(k) Third Party Review Program a...
6 comments:
These are the facts
›
Ugly source: RSNA2020 live demo Nanox has not submitted anything for FDA approval. It is illegal to market a Class II MEDICAL device, such ...
January 07, 2021
Random youtube comments
›
Some random comments, slightly edited, on youtube [and elsewhere]: If the FDA approves or clears a device that violates the laws of physics,...
‹
›
Home
View web version