NaNOx Chronicles

This is a blog about all things NaNOx

▼
February 26, 2021

You can't have it both ways

›
Even the best artists (scam artists included) slip sometimes - they are human, after all.  Let's take a listen to what the CEO has to sa...
February 24, 2021

The production Nanox.Arc has no detector?

›
So John Nosta puts a  tweet  out that shows that Nanox.Arc has no detector , and therefore, cannot make any images.  Stock goes up 15%. Her...
February 18, 2021

Nanox is faking it and stealing

›
Nanox posted a promotional video today titled "NanoxCLOUD Demo Flow" and then removed it (after some comments on it emerged).  It...
2 comments:
February 09, 2021

The individuals behind the Nanox pump

›
I was referred to a  writeup by a self-described stock marker nerd and writer for the  The Motley Fool  (thanks Nibbler @AuntMinnie).   Whi...
January 29, 2021

Tricky terminology

›
Nanox has a problem with the terminology it is using - is it innocently incompetent or intentionally misleading?   Nanox typically, but not ...
January 27, 2021

Asking stupid questions

›
So, a stupid question arose today in a discussion about what would be a plausible defense by a scam artist. Question: Did Nanox CEO graduat...
January 25, 2021

The Swedish Nanox - Luxbright

›
Luxbright is a publicly-traded stock in Sweden that claims to have developed a ZnO "whiskers" cold-cathode x-ray tube. Luxbright ...
January 20, 2021

Planned spontaneity

›
There are two reasons why the scan of the CEO's hand at RSNA 2020 was not spontaneous as he pretended. Reason 1:  About 9:20 into video ...
January 14, 2021

The weight of a human, CE Marking, and the rest

›
The fake battery-powered  Nanox.Arc 1.0  body scanner can withstand a human, according to a photo shown in June 2020 Haaretz article .   Nan...
January 12, 2021

Fooling one or the other, or both

›
Someone liked this comment I made: The draft registration statement filed by Nanox in early February states that the company is planning to ...
January 09, 2021

How SK Telecom promotes its investment

›
If the lie is big enough, and if you repeat it, maybe people will start believing it. Someone posted a link to the June 2020 press release ...
1 comment:
January 08, 2021

Nanox chances for FDA clearance are dimming

›
Nanox claims to have submitted its official response to an accredited Review Organization under the FDA 510(k) Third Party Review Program a...
6 comments:

These are the facts

›
Ugly source:  RSNA2020 live demo Nanox has not submitted anything for FDA approval. It is illegal to market a Class II MEDICAL device, such ...
January 07, 2021

Random youtube comments

›
Some random comments, slightly edited, on youtube [and elsewhere]: If the FDA approves or clears a device that violates the laws of physics,...
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.