NaNOx Chronicles
This is a blog about all things NaNOx
(Move to ...)
Home
Forbidden Chronicles
Legal / Terms of Use
About
▼
March 31, 2021
Marketing vs reality
›
Nanox greets us this morning with another tweet , as it is about to fail its milestone which called for "FDA approved" by the end...
March 28, 2021
The "nano" in Nanox isn't
›
So, Nanox has been boasting in the technology section on its website: Over nine years of development by a Japanese and Israeli engineering...
4 comments:
March 26, 2021
CT vs Tomo vs Fluoro
›
I have been having some interesting discussion with Nuno Lemos aka StockZombie @ Twitter, who has compiled his due diligence on Nanox at ...
1 comment:
March 22, 2021
An early easter egg
›
Nanox removed the link to its Mammography white paper from its webpage sometime in January 2021 (the paper was first published in late Nove...
March 19, 2021
How does the device look like?
›
Nanox website, investor presentations, social media, press releases and promo pieces are all littered with designs and photos of various ver...
March 18, 2021
Does the FDA ever disagree with the Third Party recommendation?
›
Let us assume for a moment that Nanox were not a fraud and the Third Party did indeed recommend SE on December 28, 2020. Is it possible tha...
1 comment:
The chip that proves that Nanox is a fraud
›
Nanox tweets how its "small" chip is changing 100 years. That would be quite a feat, if the chip were not fake. But it is easy...
March 15, 2021
Another market-moving tweet
›
Nanox tweets that is going to change the world, and the stock jumps 15%. The market is oblivious to the irony that it is investors who have...
Doubting the doubter
›
Doubter71050722 tweets this morning that the CEO sold 750,000 shares after the Q4 results call, and everyone on Twitter doubts him. Stock...
March 13, 2021
Importance of using the right terminology
›
Nanox and its promoters want you to believe that FDA clearance, also known as premarket notification or 510(k), and FDA approval are the sam...
March 12, 2021
Side by side
›
Nanox tweets "It's time to move forward. It's time for Nanox." Maybe it is the Twitter limitation, but it is not clear wh...
March 11, 2021
Foolish misdirection
›
Nanox stock is up more than 15% today. The catalyst may have been a nice promo that claims that Nanox, the healthcare disrupter, is about ...
A reason
›
There are many reasons why I suspect that Nanox did not submit anything to anyone for FDA clearance, or if it did, it did so fraudulently. ...
March 10, 2021
Another weird press release
›
According to the today's press release , Nanox is Scaling up Semiconductor Fabrication Plant in South Korea in light of Increased De...
1 comment:
March 09, 2021
Why Nanox.Arc has no chance for clearance
›
Nanox has a nice video on its front webpage titled " Understanding Nanox technology & vision " It is extremely misleading, a...
Nanox explanation of the FDA timeline makes no sense
›
According to the latest prospectus and Q4 results call , the recent timeline of Nanox 510(k) submission goes like this: December 28, 2020: ...
March 08, 2021
Cost confusion
›
How much does the fancy Nanox.Arc 2.0 cost to manufacture? The original press release says $10,000, and it can do, among others: Real-time ...
March 05, 2021
Yes, We sCam!
›
Nanox tweets an interesting excerpt today, stating that the company has already made 25 of its ARC systems at a partner facility in Isra...
March 03, 2021
Nanox CEO caught lying again
›
According to Nanox CEO, SK Hynix is one of the largest MEMs manufacturers in the world. That is an outright lie. Here is the ranking of...
March 02, 2021
Quick credibility check
›
It is easy to spot that Nanox' management is not familiar with this simple thing called the truth. Here is a quick example. Today'...
‹
›
Home
View web version