NaNOx Chronicles

This is a blog about all things NaNOx

▼
April 28, 2021

The curious case of Nanox.Arc's development

›
Last week @Ehlyz on Yahoo linked to a webpage of the engineering firm Ziv-Av and wrote: If you are still worried this company is fraud and ...
April 21, 2021

Another confirmation that Nanox.Arc is fake

›
Nanox tweets a short video today, confirming that Nanox.Arc is a non-functional fake "future product," rather than a real device ...
April 16, 2021

Lost in translation

›
According to a recent Google-translated Korean  article  about the planned fab , or factory, Nanox plans to make only 2,000 x-ray tubes a mo...
April 13, 2021

The tube chart that proves that Nanox is a fraud

›
Nanox team does not (or pretends not to) understand basic x-ray physics and engineering.  Its "technology" webpage and white pape...
April 08, 2021

How live was RSNA 2020?

›
The CEO insists that the RSNA 2020 demo was live.  But was it really live, or was only the artist performance live? An observant anonymous ...
April 07, 2021

News in Nanox annual report

›
What's news and notable in Nanox annual report , relative to the Prospectus filed in February?  Material weakness We have identified a ...
April 06, 2021

Pumping while selling

›
 The CEO went on Bloomberg yesterday to pump the stock.   He did not tell the audience that he put an order to sell 1,003,931 shares just ho...
April 03, 2021

Nanox announces FDA clearance of something

›
According to the press release , Nanox single-source Nanox.ARC digital x-ray technology has received 510(k) clearance from the US Food and D...
April 01, 2021

KvP / mA - the shocking proof that Nanox is a fraud

›
Nanox prospectuses are riddled with false and misleading statements some consider to be material.  Here is a recent example that always trip...
1 comment:
March 31, 2021

Marketing vs reality

›
Nanox greets us this morning with another tweet , as it is about to fail its milestone which called for "FDA approved" by the end...
March 28, 2021

The "nano" in Nanox isn't

›
So, Nanox has been boasting in the technology section on its website:  Over nine years of development by a Japanese and Israeli engineering...
4 comments:
March 26, 2021

CT vs Tomo vs Fluoro

›
I have been having some interesting discussion with Nuno Lemos aka StockZombie @ Twitter, who has compiled his due diligence on Nanox at ...
1 comment:
March 22, 2021

An early easter egg

›
Nanox removed the link to its Mammography white paper from its webpage sometime in January 2021 (the paper was first published in late Nove...
March 19, 2021

How does the device look like?

›
Nanox website, investor presentations, social media, press releases and promo pieces are all littered with designs and photos of various ver...
March 18, 2021

Does the FDA ever disagree with the Third Party recommendation?

›
Let us assume for a moment that Nanox were not a fraud and the Third Party did indeed recommend SE on December 28, 2020.  Is it possible tha...
1 comment:
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.